2024年 8月 の投稿一覧

MHLW Considers Introducing Patent Linkage System in Generics and Biosimilars

Introduction to Regulatory Changes

According to the news (後発品の特許抵触で専門家照会制度を検討  厚労省、25日の制度部会で提案へ | 日刊薬業 – 医薬品産業の総合情報サイト (jiho.jp)) released by NIKKAN YAKUGYO on July 24, 2024, the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) presented a proposal on July 25, 2024, at the Pharmaceutical Affairs and Food Sanitation Council’s subcommittee on Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Systems. The proposal focuses on improving the operation of the “Patent Linkage System”—a system that ensures generic and biosimilar drugs do not infringe on the patents of the original innovator drugs before they receive approval.

 

Clarification of Patent Definitions and Scope

The Ministry aims to clarify the definitions and scope of substance and use patents, which must be considered during the approval process. This move is intended to prevent discrepancies between innovators and generic/biosimilar drug companies that often lead to litigation. Such legal disputes can threaten the stable supply of generic and biosimilar drugs in Japan, a concern raised by industry stakeholders during a subcommittee hearing in May.

 

Proposal for Expert Consultation System

Given the complexities of patent law and the absence of a system for expert consultation, the MHLW acknowledges the difficulty in determining the extent of patent rights and whether a generic or biosimilar drug infringes upon them. To address this, the Ministry has proposed establishing a task force team to discuss the processes consulting patent infringement and the criteria for approving generics and biosimilars. This taskforce team would also explore mechanisms to incorporate expert opinions into the decision-making process, aiming to implement a formal system where third-party experts provide opinions on potential patent conflicts.

 

Potential Impact on Drug Approvals

By establishing a more transparent framework and involving independent experts, the MHLW hopes to streamline the approval process for generics and biosimilars, minimize the risk of legal disputes, and ensure a more stable supply of affordable medicines in Japan. This initiative might also affect the strategies and timelines for overseas pharmaceutical companies entering the Japanese market.

 

The Ministry’s efforts to refine the Patent Linkage System reflect a broader commitment to balancing patent protection with the need for affordable medicines, making Japan an increasingly attractive market for global pharmaceutical companies.

 

Japan Revises Regulations on Post-Marketing Surveillance

Introduction to Regulatory Changes 

According to the news (厚労省、全例調査の除外規定を事務連絡  Q&Aを一部改正 | 日刊薬業 – 医薬品産業の総合情報サイト (jiho.jp)) released by NIKKAN YAKUGYO on 07/19/2024, significant changes have been made regarding the requirement for All Case Surveillance (ACS) as a condition for drug approval, and ACS will no longer be uniformly required. Instead, exceptions are now permitted based on specific criteria. This revision is part of the ongoing efforts to address drug lag and streamline regulatory processes. In the above context, the amendments of the Q&A on the regulation of ACS are available. 

 

Key Amendments to the Q&A 

The revised guidelines clarify that insufficient Japanese patient data in clinical trials should not be the sole reason for requiring ACS as part of the approval conditions. Examples where ACS may be reconsidered include: 

  • Cases where, despite limited Japanese trial data, sufficient safety information is available from international trials, and there are no significant ethnic differences in safety concerns. 
  • Cases where similar drugs with the same mechanism of action have established safety records, and consistent safety data is available. 

 

Background and Implications  

This policy shift is rooted in the findings of the April 24 report from the “Study Group on Pharmaceutical Regulations to Strengthen Drug Development and Ensure Stable Supply.” The MHLW aims to improve the efficiency of the drug approval process while ensuring safety and effectiveness. Reducing unnecessary ACS requirements alleviates the regulatory burden on pharmaceutical companies, potentially accelerating the introduction of new drugs to the Japanese market. 

 

Conclusion  

These changes mark a significant step towards optimizing Japan’s pharmaceutical regulatory framework. Pharmaceutical companies in the Japanese market should carefully review these updates to understand the new regulatory expectations and align their post-marketing surveillance strategies accordingly.